Categories
Proposals Cycling Walking

Edgeley to Stockport cycle route plans: another A6 cop-out?

Stockport Council have just opened a new Bee Network walking and cycling consultation, for a route from Edgeley, bridging the mainline railway junction and the A6, into the town centre and marketplace.

The proposed links include new sections of “high quality” two-way segregated cycle tracks, several new crossings, quiet streets and yes, Stockport‘s favourite: several stretches of shared use cycle/footway.

A vital feature is not actually part of the consultation: a replacement for the outdated footbridge over the railway, being delivered separately by the council, Network Rail and Transport for Greater Manchester.

An overview of the Edgeley to Stockport cycle route scheme, part of the Mayors Challenge Fund, aka “Bee Network”.

You can access the consultation here to see the full plans and give your thoughts about each section, until 2nd July 2021.

Two further consultations are also due from the council soon: part of the Heatons Cycle Link and a Romiley to Stockport link.

“Is it worth my time filling these in?” I hear you cry. Yes, it really is. There’s an example in this very scheme where things have changed substantially thanks to a previous consultation.

Last summer, the council ran a consultation just on the Railway Road part of this route (the main road leading into Stockport station). This was roundly criticised online for its bumbling route and use of shared space and that reflected in the feedback: 46% strongly disagreed or disagreed.

Now this scheme changes the proposal quite a bit, relocating the two-way cycle track to the south side of the road, uninterrupted, segregated for almost its whole length and with a much simpler crossing of the A6. So, yes — it’s worth providing feedback.

The route passes through a car park then, rather than simply join the A6, diverts onto a new path down an embankment, behind a multi-storey car park. But at least the segregated cycleway alongside Railway Road here makes more sense than the version presented last year?

It’s still not perfect there, especially how it just ends across the A6 at John Street, but then even despite adding what looks on the surface like lots of lovely segregated cycle tracks, none of this scheme seems completely ideal in full.

Yet again, Stockport’s highways planners are skirting around the one central issue facing people who want to cycle into or through the town: the A6. This scheme is excessively over-designed just to keep people on bikes as far away from that road as possible (with its unnecessary five lanes of traffic in places), rather than simply giving them a safe, direct route on it.

The route passes through a car park (because who doesn’t love cycling through a car park with vehicles doing three-point turns) before diverting behind the buildings, away from any passive surveillance that the street itself offers.

A frustrating example of this is the bit of path proposed between the two huge car parks built and planned at Stockport Exchange, beside the station. Due to the narrow space available, this switches from a segregated path to a shared space.

Now given these are brand new car parks, planned with the authority of the council itself (and one of which not even built yet), isn’t it a bit of a joke they couldn’t have reserved an extra metre for pedestrians and cyclists? Are these links really that much of an afterthought? (Don’t answer that.)

That’s it folks, that’s your mainline Bee Network cycle link. Now imagine another multi-storey car park up to 16 metres high filling all that space on the left, just to make it really appealing!

And what will it be like to cycle through this narrow canyon between and behind multi-storey car parks in practice? Especially at night? The second car park will be up to 16 metres high according to planning documents. This is surely going to create a very unappealing route for people who are concerned about personal safety.

Ultimately, rather than directing people on bikes down back-alleys, why doesn’t the council just use some of the three-car-wide Greek Street to provide a highly visible cycle track, or even the existing link here, connecting into segregated lanes on the A6 itself, past the Town Hall? More expensive perhaps, but if the Bee Network is meant to be a world-class, safe network, done properly…

The route could’ve led to this existing filter (and protected lanes on the actual, direct A6). At the minute it seems to exist awaiting a purpose alongside the current 5-lane dual carriageway A6. The Town Hall is behind the camera.

Special mention, also, to the council’s ongoing sticking plaster for cycling that is shared foot/cycleways, supposed to be almost outlawed under Bee Network guidelines but still slipping through everywhere in the south east.

Here they’re proposing to magically switch just a short length of existing pavement on the A6 near the Hat Works Museum to shared use, to provide a link between the rooftop park of the new bus interchange and St Petersgate. The new interchange will have a cycle hub and a lift big enough for bikes up to the park and A6 (not exactly Utrecht, but it’s something).

Shop and support

Bikes, accessories and gear to start your next adventure. Simply buying through these links is a totally free way to support the cost of keeping Peaks & Puddles online. See more here.

A new crossing there will be a great improvement for pedestrians and wheelchair users, making a much more accessible, easy link from the bus station up to the popular marketplace. Yet expecting everyone to fight over shared space, even for a few metres, in a bustling place like this seems ridiculous when there are unprotected, painted cycle lanes right there on the A6 itself.

The narrow, unprotected, painted lanes over the Mersey Square bridge are bad enough, but it’s the way they just *end* that’s worse. Here Stockport Council, nudging you to turn off the A6 and cross the pavement, are saying in all but words: “now dear cyclists, please p*ss off round the back, away from the all-important cars!”

Why are those horrors not receiving protection? Why is Stockport Council, its highways officers and its current leadership determined to continue avoiding making the A6 fit for purpose in a climate emergency, when there are other perfectly good (and recently widened) arterial roads to take the strain?

If the town wants to truly shake off its past image problems, it needs to move on from this desperate attitude of seeing cycling as second-class traffic, something to be stuffed down a back alley between car parks. This new route may solve a few basic problems, but it turns out this isn’t the Bee Network we were promised.

  • In filling in the consultation, it’s worth questioning the suitability of the narrow, hidden link between the multi-storey car parks, and why protected cycle lanes are not being provided on the main A6 between the Town Hall and Mersey Square instead, solving much of what the council appears to be trying to solve here in one blow.

Found this post helpful?

Please consider chipping in the price of a coffee to help pay the bills and support my work, ensuring this resource remains here and free to access for everyone. It only takes a minute.

Buy me a coffee
About Peaks & Puddles

Hello, I'm Anthony. I started Peaks & Puddles to chart the ups and downs of cycling and walking the edges of the Peak District around Buxton, Macclesfield and Stockport, and to help more people explore this brilliant landscape between town and country. Find out more about me and Peaks & Puddles here.